Fix reading geoTiff - #12
Open
jansule wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
When reading geoTiff all grid values were set to 0.0 due to commenting out relevant code. More specifically: `band.ReadRaster()` sets the values for the double array `line`. Otherwise line will only be an array of `0.0` and its values will be added to the grid, ignoring the actual values of the rasterband. This code was commented out 9 years ago in eclab@d7a6442. I am not sure if this fix will have side effects on that commit.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When reading geoTiff all grid values were set to 0.0 due to commenting out relevant code.
More specifically:
band.ReadRaster()sets the values for the double arrayline. When not calling the function, line will only be an array of0.0and its values will be added to the grid, ignoring the actual values of the rasterband.This code was commented out 9 years ago in d7a6442. I am not sure if this fix will have side effects on that commit.